Corel aftershot pro 2 coupon7/3/2023 ![]() Noise Removal: ASP better (IMHO - it has several ways including Noise Ninja OOTB).Straighten: ASP much better (in fact, LR doesn't have but one could fake it).Layered editing: ASP only EDIT:(however you can have masks on each layer).Local editing: The following two are competing.Importing: ASP no need to import to do enough tasks with files.LR - sloooow (on Core i5 3550, 16GB RAM, Win7) I understand there might be some subjectiveness into this, please let me know with comments if there's any interest in making the answer a collaborative wiki.ĪfterShotPro 1.0.1 = ASP, Lightroom = LR 4.1 (sorry I don't have personal experience with DarkTable) There is more than just the features for instance I hear color management on Linux is hard - I don't want to launch an off-topic discussion about it, but if there's a very strong agreement on such a point it will be an issue against DarkTable(edit: i investigated and it's actually false). Price is of course an element of the comparison, but only at an equal feature point. ![]() My experience though is that it takes way more than 30 days to discover the real features AND limitations of this kind of software. I do know that lightroom is great and that you don't get wrong with that -), and that I could test drive all of them. I'm wondering whether somebody has been able to test them all (or most!) and provide a first-person feedback on which features stand up / are lacking in comparison, plus any additional experience advise in comparing these software. (I do not have a mac so Aperture is not an option) Rawtherapee free open source edit: lacking catalogue.DarkTable free open source (multiplatform linux/mac/windows).Corel AfterShot Pro now on sale at 59.9$ from 99.9$.I'm quite satisfied with Picasa as a catalogue, definitely not for any photo processing other thank a quick saturation and sharpening bumb, but without local edits it does not work all the time. I'll be trying to shot more raw as soon as I realize that, with the appropriate tool, the result is worth it over in-camera jpg conversion.enhance my pics (mostly jpg*) with a fair balance of feature vs.The basic of what I'm looking into is a step-up, single stop (if possible!) solution to: I understand that I should upgrade from my basic workflow (mostly Picasa + some Cyberlink PhotoDirector).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |